Tabletop exercises are commonly associated with crisis management training; however, there are many other situations where they can provide significant value at modest cost. In today’s post, we’ll look at eight ways this unsung type of exercise can boost your organization’s resilience.
Related on MHA Consulting: Little Things Mean a Lot: The Value of Micro Mock Disaster Exercises
There are two things that everyone who works in business continuity management (BCM) knows about tabletop exercises: You are most likely to encounter them when doing crisis management (CM) training. And they are a poor substitute for full-blown exercises.
In today’s blog, we’re going to challenge both of these ideas.
Tabletop exercises are good for a lot more than CM training.
And they should not be thought of as a poor substitute for anything. Rather, they are their own special animal, with their own unique value and benefits.
It would not be wise for any organization to conduct only tabletop exercises. Full-blown exercises offer benefits in identifying gaps and training staff that cannot be obtained through any other means.
However, properly conceived and applied tabletops provide benefits that other types of exercises cannot, and at a modest cost in time, risk, and resources.
As a reminder, the reason we conduct exercises in BCM and IT/disaster recovery (IT/DR) is to see whether our recovery strategies, plans, and documentation will work as they’re supposed to in the event of an outage.
Exercises help to identify gaps and issues in plans, processes, technologies, equipment, and dependencies. They also provide training and practice for participants and might be required for regulatory or contractual reasons.
BC exercises exist across a spectrum.
At one end, they are highly realistic and involved tests spanning many days in which hundreds of people carry out the BC plan in actuality, going off-site and running productively for a period of time just as they would in a real event.
At the other end is the humble tabletop, where a handful of people sit around a table for a couple of hours pretending that something bad happened and talking through what they would do to respond.
If there is any glamor at all in BC testing, it’s connected with the most involved exercises.
However (and paradoxically), the least realistic form of exercise—the tabletop—offers in some ways the most realistic test of a company’s plans. Why? Because it is not propped up by ad hoc arrangements meant to protect production or ensure the exercise is “successful.”
Here are eight ways that tabletop exercises can provide real value to a testing program, thus helping the organization identify gaps, train its staff, and improve its recovery plans:
That makes eight ways that the lowly tabletop exercise can provide benefits that cannot be obtained (or obtained as easily) by full-scale recovery exercises.
Tabletops are often thought of as limited to use in crisis management training and/or as a poor substitute for full-fledged recovery exercises. In fact, they are a valuable tool in testing the full range of BCM and IT/DR recovery plans and offer many benefits that are difficult or impossible to achieve through other testing methods.
All organizations that are committed to strengthening their recovery plans and becoming more resilient would be well-advised to consider making thoughtful use of tabletop exercises in their BCM and IT/DR testing programs.
For more information on BCM and IT/DR exercises and other hot topics in BC and IT/disaster recovery, check out these recent posts from MHA Consulting and BCMMETRICS: