In recent blogs we have discussed various aspects of risk mitigation, including risk acceptance, risk avoidance, risk limitation, and risk transference. This week’s blog will focus primarily on the area of risk limitation, the most common risk management strategy used by businesses.
You will recall that risk mitigation is defined as taking steps to reduce adverse effects. We have previously discussed the concepts of risk acceptance, risk avoidance, and risk transference.
Risk acceptance (a conscious decision to take no action to limit the risk) is the opposite of risk avoidance (the decision to take action that is intended to avoid any exposure to the risk). Risk avoidance is usually the most expensive of all risk mitigation options, while risk acceptance is typically chosen because the cost of other risk management options may outweigh the cost of the risk itself. Risk transference acknowledges the risk, but involves handing off that risk to a willing third party.
So what is risk limitation? Risk limitation is a strategy designed to limit a company’s exposure by taking some action or series of actions. It is meant to lessen any negative consequence or impact of specific, known risks, and is most often used when risks are unavoidable. It may involve implementing controls that will reduce the probability that a risk will occur, or minimize adverse impacts when the risk does occur.
Here are several examples from actual organizations:
Risk limitation does not mean that measures are in place to avoid any potential issues. It does mean that proper evaluation has occurred and steps have been taken to reduce the likelihood of occurrence or to minimize the impact of an occurrence. Build your risk limitation strategy incrementally, making improvements based on your own real world experience.